To professionally test the longevity of a perfume, it is necessary to combine human sensory evaluation with instrumental analysis while strictly controlling the testing conditions. The following is a systematic testing method and key influencing factors:
I. Professional sensory testing method (human evaluation)
Standardized skin testing method
Accelerated testing instrument-assisted method
Weigh the sponge ball after soaking it in perfume, then secure it inside the test chamber;
Multiple scent evaluators sniff at a distance of 5 cm at regular intervals (every 10 minutes);
Compile the assessment results from three or more evaluators to determine the fragrance retention time.
II. Instrumental Analysis Testing Method (Objective Data)
Analyzes the release curve of volatile components and quantifies the concentration of fragrance molecules at different time points.
Detects the residual amount of non-volatile components (such as fixatives) and complements GC-MS's analytical blind spots for polar molecules.
Simulates human olfaction by recording the decay of fragrance intensity through a sensor array, avoiding sensory fatigue errors.
Evaluates the fragrance retention capability of packaging materials (e.g., film permeability rate), suitable for product storage research.
III. Key Factors Affecting Fragrance Retention Time
Perfume (Parfum) >8 hours, Eau de Parfum (EDP) 5–6 hours, Eau de Toilette (EDT) 3–4 hours, Eau de Cologne (EDC) 1–2 hours.
Fixatives: Resins, synthetic musks, or new polymers (e.g., Citropol®F) extend fragrance retention by reducing evaporation rates or forming a fixed fragrance film.
Temperature, humidity, and wind speed accelerate evaporation; dry skin retains fragrance for shorter durations than oily skin.
IV. Practical Application Recommendations
Summary
Professional testing requires a dual approach of “sensory + instrument”: human assessment simulates real-world usage scenarios, while instrument analysis provides objective data. Additionally, fragrance longevity is influenced by concentration, formulation technology, and environmental factors, so results must be interpreted under controlled conditions. For general users, the wrist timing sniffing method (combined with a record sheet) is the most feasible self-testing solution; corporate R&D requires laboratory equipment for in-depth analysis.